-1200x630.webp&w=1920&q=50)
Joey Veerman receives a big compliment from PSV after his ban for his interview
1 min readJoey Veerman has received a lot of appreciation for his candid reaction after losing the Johan Cruijff Shield to AZ 0-4. The PSV midfielder, who early in the match struck Mexx Meerdink in the head with his studs and received a red card for it, said afterwards to ESPN that he understands the referee’s decision. He also expressed his condolences to AZ’s striker.
Veerman saw his match end after nine minutes. Referee Serdar Gözübüyük received advice from VAR Pol van Boekel to review the footage again and then decided to send off the PSV midfielder. According to Veerman, there was no question of intent.
"I did have the idea right away that I would be sent off," says Veerman. "He makes a kind of movement with his head to the left. I quickly put my foot down, but I do feel that I put my pin behind his ear and that I hit him. So then I already thought: yes, he’ll probably give a red card. And that’s what happened."
The Volendammer said that he was taking a red card into account right away. At the same time, he had the impression that Gözübüyük did not make the decision with conviction. "I could also tell from Serdar that he actually didn’t want to give it to him, because I think he thought I’d lightly touched him. And yes, that was basically true, because it wasn’t like I really drove into him fully. But I also felt kind of sorry for Meerdink, though, because he was lying there shaking on the pitch. He had a hefty goosebump behind his ear."
Afterwards, Veerman visibly sympathized with his opponent, who lay on the pitch looking badly shaken. "He really had pain", Veerman noticed. "I did think it was kind of sad, yes. I just put my pin behind his ear. You can also see it in my reaction right away: this was not a nice touch, so to speak."
The midfielder also said that he went straight after the incident to Meerdink to reassure him. "I was trying to keep him calm a bit, because I could tell he was a little panicked. I understand that too, because if it had been the other way around, I would have been as well. But anyway, let me emphasize that, in my view, everyone has seen that this was absolutely not the intention. It was also my first red card in my career. I just wanted to poke the ball away. It was very unfortunate. I hope his wound heals quickly."
Veerman's honest explanation earned him a lot of positive reactions. On social media, his open attitude was praised and at the table on ESPN too, appreciation was heard. "Good response", presenter Milan van Dongen said. Kenneth Perez then added a wink: "Would Paredes have given this response as well?" Marciano Vink was also complimentary about the PSV player. According to the analyst, Veerman is "always honest and sincere". "It’s all also true what he says. A great guy."



Comments11
I am not convinced by the lineup logic. If the article is hyping the same midfield structure again, i worry it will be the same story after 60 minutes, especially against teams that press high. 💀
GOAL!! That final action was pure PSV DNA. 🙌 But please, can we stop giving away those cheap second balls after the first pass.
Ngl, i think they got the balance wrong. Playing too cautious with the 8 and then expecting the 9 to do everything is a recipe for a messy game.
I actually like the plan mentioned, especially getting width early. But the finishing still needs to be cleaner, there were too many half chances that didnt become real shots on target. Rocket energy, but we need goals. 🚀
"taking the initiative" yeah but can we do it without leaving space behind? If the fullbacks jump, someone has to cover properly, because transitions will kill us. 🤬
"We need more width"... yeah, but who is actually tracking the fullback runs? If the winger is 1v1 for 10 minutes, we should have at least one overlap or underlap. 🔥
That quote about building from the back is brave, but only works when the press traps their outlet. 👀 If we lose the ball in our half again, we look exposed instantly.
That quote about "taking the initiative" is nice, but we keep starting slow in big games. W at we do when the opponent sits deep? More direct runs please, otherwise it becomes safe football and we struggle to break lines. 💯⚽
If PSV let the midfield get overrun again, then nothing else matters. Idk if the article nailed the real issue, but it screams "control the tempo" first.
Im not convinced our midfield is controlling the tempo. One good press and then we get too nervous on the second ball, feels like we lose it twice in a row sometimes. Need more composure, not just energy 😅
If PSV really want to press higher, they need Til and the back line to coordinate better. Last matches showed gaps when the first pass is played through the middle, and that has to be fixed. 👀🔥